On Wednesday, President Mugabe used the state-owned and operated newspaper
The Herald to post a list of senior civil servants he had picked. The problem? He did not consult Prime Minister
Tsvangirai, which made this his first misdoing on the agreement to share power the two men had made some months ago.
Tsvangirai declared in an email, "The announcement of permanent secretaries has no force of law and is therefore null and void."
The Herald ran a list of senior civil servant appointees selected by
Muagbe without any other kind of confirmation. This is nothing new in a country where the major newspapers are owned by the government.
The New York Times ran an article about this calling the state media "his mouthpiece," a statement not far from the truth.
In reading (or trying to read, because most of the time, the websites do not work) the newspapers from Zimbabwe, I've noticed many
miscongruencies. The number of cholera cases as reported by
The Herald and by other major news and medical organizations (
The New York Times, Doctors Without Borders) are so significantly different it seems a bit fishy. When Mugabe's wife was arrested in
Hong Kong, no word was mentioned of it in the press in the country.
I also find it weird the websites do not
have a comprehensive archive of the stories. What you read on the website today, you will not be able to easily find on the website tomorrow. The websites also tend to be down a lot. When you visit them, you have the option of "click here if you're in Zimbabwe" or "click here if you're outside of Zimbabwe." If you click the outside option, the html coding tends to be messed up to the point where the text of the story is so sk
ewed on the page, you can't read the story. The in Zimbabwe option tends to work out okay though.